Need to redo and answer the questions for a better grade

Humanities

Chase:

In the assignment you wanted to focus on the following topics:

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

II. Jack’s Case

a) Were Jack’s due process and constitutional rights violated during the investigation process? Explain your arguments.

b) Were Jack’s due process and constitutional rights violated during the hearing process? Explain your arguments.

c) If you were the defense attorney, what arguments would you make in defense of Jack? Defend your response.

d) If you were the prosecutor, what arguments would you make in prosecution of Jack? Defend your response.

e) Describe how Jack’s case would have been handled differently in the federal system. How would the process be different?

f) Determine what would be an appropriate court‐ordered option for Jack. Explain why this option is appropriate.

In this part of the milestone, it appears that you used material in last week’s assignment, in place of the specific topics needed for this milestone. The responses you provided need to form great depth and insight to make a quality response. Think of the responses as an opportunity to allow the reader to gain knowledge and understanding.

I strongly encourage you to make use of the Writing Center and to see the writing tips I have posted in the Announcement. This will help you form a better research paper and a better grade in the final paper.

Make the following revision, before submitting the final paper.

Rubrics:
Jack’s Case: The Investigation: Explains if Jack’s due process and constitutional rights were violated during the investigation process, but does not explain arguments, with depth and detail, to assist a judge in determining to increase or decrease a sentence to impose.

What iformation about Jack should the sentensing judge know?

The judge should know about jack’s past to see if he has a record or ais a repeat offender. This will help him/her determine the right punishment (State Attorney Office For The Fourth Judicial Circuit, 2019).

Jack’s Case: Hearing Process: 0 points – Does not explain if Jack’s due process and constitutional rights were violated during the hearing process

Jack’s Case: Defense: 0 points – Does not establish defense arguments for Jack

Jack’s Case: Prosecution: 0 points – Does not establish prosecuting arguments for Jack

Jack’s Case: Federal System: 0 points – Does not describe how Jack’s case would have been handled differently in the federal system

Jack’s Case: Court-Ordered Option: 11.25 points – Determines what would be an appropriate punishment but does not explain why the court-ordered option is appropriate, to develop a clear and informative response.

What are the possible court oderedoptions for jack?

Jack was aggressive towards the shopkeeper. There is a eye witnes. The judge uis likely to order a secured detention for Jack her he can be held within a juvenile detention center. He could be released on the basis of good conduct.

In conclusion, jack was denied his right to have an attorney pressent during questioning. The general police station environment could have negatively affected 13 year old Jack. He needed someone to speak on his behalf.

Articulation of Response: 0 points – Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

If you make use of the Writing Center, you can resubmit this paper by the end of Week Four, to have an opportunity to improve on your grade.

Rich